That distinction is why a verified regulatory corpus matters. Not a model's general knowledge of what governance law probably says, but the real, current text of the actual instruments that govern a specific board, in a specific jurisdiction, checked directly against the regulator that published it.
MyDirector-OS has spent months building exactly that level of library. Every governing law, every regulatory code, every piece of guidance a director might need has been checked directly against the regulator's own published source, not assumed correct. Listing rules, governance codes, and accounting disclosure standards sit alongside it as their own verified categories, sourced directly from the relevant regulator or standard-setting body in every case.
The library runs on a continuous freshness cycle, maintained daily and checked automatically at a pace matched to real risk.
Amendments to existing law are tracked as their own discipline. When a regulator publishes an amendment, it's linked to the specific law it changes and read alongside it, never silently merged into a new, unofficial version of the text.
The same standard applies to every answer generated. A citation is checked against the actual instrument it names before it reaches you. Where something can't be verified, the platform says so plainly, rather than presenting an unconfirmed answer with false confidence.
Governance built on verification, not assumption.